CGIAR / Fish / Livestock / Research

Week 5: Forging and catalyzing partnerships

As described in previous weeks of this e-consultation, the Mega Program for ‘More meat, milk and fish by and for the poor’ proposes to serve as the catalyst to align research and development actors in coalitions to address the development challenge of reducing the malnutrition and enhancing food security amongst poor vulnerable households and target groups. These coalitions will mobilize resources for major development interventions to improve productivity and production in selected animal product value chains to benefit the poor; they will also mobilize relevant knowledge and support its application during program implementation.

Because we intend to address the complete value chain, we will need to engage with a wide range of partners according to their competencies and interests. On the research side, we will partner with researchers from the national agricultural research system and universities, and we will leverage technical expertise from advanced research institutes. On the development side, we will work closely with national ministries and public services, civil society (non-governmental and community-based organizations), farmer and producer organizations, and the private sector. We may also need to partner with specialized organizations – in the communication area for example. Making these partnerships effective will be critical to the success of the program.

In this last week of our e-consultation, we want to focus on our proposed partnership strategy. The assumption underlying our strategy is that value chain development is complex and requires working closely with a wide variety of actors. As highlighted by stakeholders at our consultation meeting last week in Addis Ababa, it is best that prospective partners be involved from the beginning. We recognize, though, that value chain development is a dynamic process, and so the partners involved and the roles they play—including the CGIAR partners—will continuously evolve and change over time.

In this context, our strategy will be to scope out the range of relevant institutions and organizations at the national and sub-national levels and then conduct a participatory partnership analysis in which we collectively identify value chain development needs and the potential roles each partner can play in responding to these, their particular strengths, the incentives motivating their contribution, and their expectations. We conducted such an exercise at the stakeholder meeting last week.

Appropriate partnership arrangements in each country will then be established using a ‘working group’ format to coordinate activities and to continuously monitor the partnerships. A key indicator of a healthy partnership dynamic will be the ability of the working group to attract both research and development funding to support the value chain development agenda.

At the grassroots level where the action happens, the target beneficiaries – the people who work within the value chain, including farmers, processors, traders, etc. – also need to be engaged as full partners in the process. While we expect their interests to be represented to some degree by the partner organizations in the working groups, we envisage that more meaningful engagement and partnership with stakeholders and actors within the value chain will be formed as part of the innovation systems approach to implement development actions.

Brokering action networks at this level is a critical role that has to be played by the partners who operate in the areas and have the necessary legitimacy, credibility and social capital. Who is most appropriate to play this role, is very context specific.

Getting your thoughts…

We would appreciate your feedback on this strategy:

STEP 1: Please click here to answer three questions on forging and catalyzing partnerships, then come back to this page.

STEP 2: Next, please comment on the questions below.

Week 5- Question 1: Capacity building for innovation? Innovation brokerage (facilitating linkages among actors in the innovation system and negotiating towards common goals) at the local value chain level is an intensive process of facilitation and negotiation, especially with the private sector to level the playing field. Do such skills exist in national partner organizations or should building such capacities be a component of the Mega program?

Week 5- Question 2: CGIAR’s catalyst role? We have highlighted the role of the CGIAR as a catalyst, recognizing that we can make a small but strategic contribution by helping generate the evidence for change and catalyzing the alignment needed to stimulate development of our target value chains. Does this underplay or overplay the role the CGIAR should be playing at country level? How can the CGIAR best complement existing competencies and capacities at the country level?

Week 5- Question 3: What information needs and communications challenges? Connecting the people and partners working in the different value chains and technology development activities will require effective flows of information and innovative communication strategies to inform and engage all the partners involved. What kinds of information and knowledge should the project generate and share? How might we best get the lessons and results of the program into the hands of local and international users and audiences?

Week 5- Question 4: Building a learning orientation? What kinds of participatory partnership monitoring and evaluation methods would help build a learning orientation in the program (through the working groups and innovation platforms)? What would be some indicators of changes in the habits, practices and behaviors of the partner organizations and individuals – including the CGIAR – that support innovation in value chains?

Or let us know any other thoughts or ideas by commenting on this blog post below.

5 thoughts on “Week 5: Forging and catalyzing partnerships

  1. I AS AN ANIMAL SCIENTIST AND AN INSEMINATOR, AM INTERESTED IN THIS PROGRAM AND WOULD LIKE TO ASSIST IN DEVELOPING THE LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY IN AFRICA BY CONTRIBUTING MY KNOWLEDGE ON PASTURE MANGEMENT, MILKING, MILK-HANDLING, CONCENTRATES FORMULATION, SILAGE MAKING AND ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION TECHNIQUES.
    MY NO IS +2347062856739

    • Anyanwu,
      Thank you for your offer! We will pass it on to the ILRI office in Ibadan. Although this program is not proposing any activities in Nigeria, the partner CG Centers may continue to have other research activities there.

  2. commend you for the commendable and tireless efforts to eradicate poverty and malnutrition in Africa and to promote effective management and sustainable exploitation of natural resources in our African countries.

    A major difficulty for English speaking is an obstacle to a continued active participation in debates and discussions undertaken in the site. I suggest and I am seeking a translation of site content to help ensure the participation of Francophones

    Regarding proposals, I believe that fish farming is a major action for the continuity of species and to ensure a large commercial production.

    My country, Mauritania has the odds rich in fish and poorly managed. Of breeding species and a protected natural park can contribute to this debate and its implementation.

    Areas for breeding fish species to produce high quality food and high commercial value may be high in this protected area of National Park

    National NGOs can participate alongside other actors in the implementation of this approach to fish farming

    Congratulations and good luck

    Français

    Je vous félicite pour les efforts louables et inlassables visant à éradiquer la pauvreté et la malnutrition en Afrique et à promouvoir une gestion et une exploitation durable des ressources naturelles dans nos pays d’Afrique.

    Une difficulté majeure de langue anglaise pour les francophones est un obstacle pour une participation active et continue dans les débats et les discussions qui entrepris dans le site. Je propose et je sollicite une traduction des contenus du site pour permettre de garantir la participation des francophones

    En ce qui concerne les propositions, je pense que l’élevage des poissons est une action importante pour la continuité des espèces et pour assurer une production commerciale grande.

    Mon pays, La Mauritanie dispose des cotes très poissonneuses et mal gérées. Des zones de reproduction des espèces et un parc naturel protégé peuvent contribuer à cette réflexion et à sa mise en œuvre.

    Des zones pour l’élevage des espèces de poisson à haute qualité de production de chère et de grande valeur commerciale peuvent être élevées dans cette zone protégée du Parc national

    Les ONGs nationales peuvent participer à coté d’autres acteurs dans la mise en œuvre de cette démarche d’élevage des poissons

    Félicitations et bon courage

  3. Question 1: people within national reserach organisations have been trained in facilitation, although they may hve difficulties in practising and further developing these skills, as there is not always a demand. Researchers, administrators and extention people are expected to do a job and the really important part of their job description are not always condusive for communication with a wide range of stakeholders. For researchers, the number of papers published in the famous double refereed journals isi in most cases more important in most research set-ups than field experience and sucessful deliveries of farmers ideas and real life problems to the research priority formulation process and the research. There are also complex interactions to be taken into account. If somebody is engaged in breeding fish for aqua-culture such as cages in the sea, advanced breeding products (e.g. bred salmon) may be a danger for a wild population of the same species as may be disease transmission.

    The type of information and media will of course depend on stakeholders. Because many stakeholders shpouöld be involved, a range of types odf information and information chamnels should be envisaged. wehereever possible stakeholders should be encouraged to specify their demands. Radio and TV should not be neglected.

    The type of igroups also depends on the specific situation. The first step should be to evaluate what is already there. Are there radio listening groups, newsletters, maybe radio broadcasts in into which the programme can feed into? – Are scientists already members of 20 existing networks and are overfed with information? – Or would a regular quarterly meeting where content is discussed be something new for a particular area? these question should be addressed before acting

  4. The whole idear is of great importance let us develop the idears slowly and effectively for the benefit of the larger community.The already researched products can be shared with CBOs and the farmer groups, by building their capacities on products they have identifyed as a need and farmer to farmer information sharing will be of great use. The role of CGIAR can further be developed as catalyst on adaptation with the farmers while conducting programs of Monitoring with Evaluation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s